Spot Survivorship Bias
Find the 31% of the market your data quietly deleted — and see what it does to a return.
What you learn to do
Find the 31% of the market your data quietly deleted — and see what it does to a return.
One sort that exposes broken corporate-action maths before it flatters your result.
Full costs and real Indian capital-gains tax — the switch that moved profitable set-ups from 4 to 17.
A leak test you verify by planting a bug yourself, then watching the test catch it.
How much of your best result is chance, not edge — and the maths that separates them.
Where this leads
Most results lie. This is where you build the thing that does not — long-term, swing and short-term strategies, from scratch, on 30 years of Indian market data. Using AI, with no coding knowledge required.
Not a strategy handed to you. A system you assembled yourself — which means when it stops working, you will know where to look instead of waiting for someone to tell you.
Not just the return. What the worst fall really means, whether a Sharpe ratio is trustworthy, how long recovery took, and why your money-weighted return differs from the headline.
Run the same strategy through 2008, 2020 and the quiet years in between. A system you have only seen in a bull market is a system you have not seen.
Hundreds of parameter combinations, walk-forward testing, and the correction that tells you how much of your best result was luck rather than edge.
Not just the return — the numbers that tell you whether you could actually have lived through it.
You will not be learning Python syntax. You will be learning what to ask for, what to check in what comes back, and when to refuse the answer. AI does the typing; the judgment stays yours, because that is the part that is actually worth having.
Register below and I will call you back to fix a time. Then, one to one, I will walk you through the platform live, run a strategy end to end, and answer whatever you want to ask — including whether this is wrong for you.
Is this for you
You have built a backtest. You are not certain you could defend it to someone who asked hard questions.
You follow rules, but you have never tested them on data that included the companies that died.
You can write the code. Nobody has told you what to check before you believe the output.
See where a research process actually earns its credibility — and where most of them quietly lose it.
Start with a method you can verify instead of a tip you have to trust.
Learn to check the claim yourself, in minutes, without taking anybody's word for it.
What you will be building
Anyone can hand you a strategy. Here you build the thing you can actually defend — long-term, swing and short-term strategies, from scratch, on 30 years of Indian market data.
Not a strategy handed to you to copy. A system you built yourself, whose behaviour you can explain to anyone who asks — including yourself, at the worst possible moment.
Three horizons, one honest engine
Rank the whole market on a schedule, hold the leaders, and let the reshuffle do the risk management.
Wait for one specific setup, take it, and exit on a stated reason — never on a calendar.
Shorter holding periods, where costs and slippage decide whether an edge survives contact with reality.
The numbers you learn to read — and read together
How far your money dropped from its highest point. The number that decides whether you could actually have held on.
Two strategies both returning 15% are not equal if one lurched to get there. This is how you compare them fairly.
Not just how deep the fall went, but how many months you sat underwater waiting to get back to even.
A blunt honesty check — and you learn to recompute it with the ten best trades removed.
A strategy that sat in cash for six years is not the same as one that was at risk every single day.
A 70% win rate means nothing until you know the size of an average win against an average loss.
The controls you learn to turn, and what each one really changes
That is the question the whole cohort is built around. You will run the same strategy through bull markets, through crashes, and through years of going nowhere. You will test it on data it has never seen, re-run it thousands of times with the fills shaken, and watch what moves when you change one control at a time. By the end you will not be hoping a system works. You will know how it behaves, what it costs you, where it breaks — and you will be making your own decisions about it.
You will not get stock recommendations, buy or sell calls, or a strategy to copy. I am not SEBI-registered and I do not give advice. What you get is a way of thinking you can apply to any strategy — yours or anyone else’s — and a one-page checklist you will keep using long after the session ends.
Your Instructor
I taught myself to build this, and I built it alone — a research platform that runs strategies across three decades of whole-market NSE data, keeping every company that later died. Everything I know about testing a strategy honestly, I learned by getting it wrong here first.
Everything I teach came out of that build, including the parts I would rather not show you. One of my own backtests once bought 6×1034 shares of a company at a fraction of a paisa and reported a profit. It did not crash. It looked completely normal. That single afternoon is why the platform now has guards, audits and a leak test that must catch a bug I plant on purpose before I trust it.
The most useful thing this platform does is tell me when a result is not as good as it looks — and it has told me that more often than I would like. A research process that can only ever agree with you is not a research process. It is an advert with charts.